Hair Philosophy
JULY 20, 2009
hair. a rudement or not?
a rudement for those who have no hair, an additional entourage for those who have it, or a reason of suffering for those who cannot cope or have no means to cope with this grassy-like heap of tiny antennas.
just born, a baby has already some hair which covers the top of his/her head.
tiny, soft, tender, gentle like a melody of a lullabye.
then- childhood: the hair is taken care of by the parents.
then- the early age of being a teen-ager- a more sophisticated approach towards the hair to emphasize one's character, to send a message to those around or just a simplified way of having it to have less problems with the thing you do not pay attention to when you have enough of it.
what made the wise choice of the Universe to offer the man so little hair on top of his head?
we can see several reasons here:
1. a rudement (just to remember the man once was or may be considered an animal);
2. the wisest ever way to keep connected to the Universe at all the times to get prompts, to receive messages to better develop what we call the intuition (a very science-fiction-like approach and, maybe, somewhat crazy);
3. protection of the scull and the brain from unexpected damages or injuries.
*the most applicable hair philosophy caould be:
if you have hair, you like it or hate it-
if you have no hair, you just:
a/ suffer;
b/ use a wig to simulate real hair you once had or might have had;
c/ are crazy and jealous as the reality is such that you don't have it though you might have liked to have some, and the others have it;
d/ do not care as you do not have it.
HAIR
IN THE WIND AND IN THE AIR,
FAIR OR UNFAIR,
HAVING BEEN TAKEN CARE
OF OR NOT,
HAIR MAKES US FEEL A LOT,
THINK A LOT AND PAY A LOT,
TILL THE TIME WE HAVE IT NOT.
Ivan Petryshyn USA 09/19/09


Hair Philosophy (12.64 KB)

